Skip to content

Product concepts, shown with how they would work.

Nothing here is a launched product. Each concept shows the problem, the proposed flow, and what we would need to validate before building it, with an honest status on every one.

Status: Concept

Request routing with human review.

The problem. Small teams get a steady stream of requests, such as customer emails, quotes and internal tickets. Sending all of them to one large AI model is slow and costly. Sending none is slow in a different way. The concept sorts each request, sends it to the right model, and keeps a person in charge of anything that matters.

  1. Step 1

    Business request

    An email, form or ticket arrives.

  2. Step 2

    Classify the task

    Contains customer records, so it must stay inside the approved boundary.

  3. Step 3

    Choose the route

    • Approved private deployment
    • Fast model
    • Reasoning model
  4. Step 4

    Validation and human review

    A person approves before anything is written back.

  5. Step 5

    Existing business system

    Approved output is written through the system's own API.

Prioritise data control

The proposed flow sends suitable tasks to a private deployment, with access limited to the information the requester is already allowed to see.

What it focuses on
Deployment, permissions, data boundaries and running overhead.
The trade-off
Private hosting costs more to run and maintain than a hosted model API.
What we would validate first
Which request types must never leave the boundary, and who signs that off.

Concept demonstration. This illustrates the proposed experience and flow, not a deployed system. The actual design would depend on the client's workflow and data.

The engineering underneath.

Business owners can stop at the outcome. Technical buyers can open the detail.

Architecture, data boundaries and trade-offs
Deployment options
A private deployment on the client's own cloud or server for sensitive data, or a hosted model API for routine work. Chosen per workflow, not per company.
Model choices
A small, fast model handles routine classification and drafting. A larger reasoning model is used only when the task needs it. Open-source models are an option where data cannot leave the building.
Data boundaries
The classifier sees the request and a short policy, not the whole database. Retrieval only returns documents the requesting user is already allowed to see.
Integrations
Read access first. Writes into the business system happen only after review, through the system's own API or a queue.
When the system is unsure
If the classifier is not confident, the request goes to a person instead of the system guessing.
Trade-offs
Private hosting costs more to run. Fast models cost less but miss more on unclear requests. Human review adds delay, so it is applied by risk level.

What we would check before building

  • Which requests in a real sample are routine and which are risky.
  • What error rate a reviewer would accept before trusting the fast path.
  • The running cost per request on each route.
  • Where the existing business system allows safe write access.

How we label every concept

ConceptThis page
The proposed design and how it would behave.
Prototype
An early build that shows selected capabilities.
In development
Active build work is underway.
Available
A usable product exists, under stated conditions.

Have a workflow like this?

Tell us how requests reach your team today. We will say whether this approach fits, and what a small first version would cost to test.